Reviewer Hub
Review the work, in the open
Institute staff, community reviewers and the public review every submitted proof here, against one published rubric. Every review is signed and goes on the public ledger.
Queue
Submissions waiting for review
Sorted by due date. Each stage has a fixed window; a stage that runs short of reviewers is flagged to the stewards, not left to stall.
6 submissions · sorted by due date
| Proof | Submission | Stage | State | Reviewers | Due | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-PRF-0043 v1.0.0 | Retrieval assistant for building maintenance manualsCourse project · AI systems · Candidate C-0190 | Institute | Reviews in progress | 1/2 | 2026-10-04 7 d overdue | Review |
| AI-PRF-0045 v1.0.0 | Phishing URL classifier with model cardCourse project · AI systems · Candidate C-0201 | Institute | Needs reviewers | 0/2 | 2026-10-06 5 d overdue | Review |
| AI-PRF-0044 v0.9.0 | Alert fatigue in small security teams: a queueing viewPaper · Cybersecurity · Adaptive Institute Security Lab | Public | Ready for decision | 9/5quorum met | 2026-10-13 2 d left | Read |
| AI-PRF-0049 v1.1.0 | DNS tunnelling detector for a campus networkCourse project · Cybersecurity · Candidate C-0213 | Public | Reviews in progress | 6/5quorum met | 2026-10-22 11 d left | Review |
| AI-PRF-0046 v1.0.1 | Flood extent mapping from Sentinel-1 radarCourse project · Earth observation · Candidate C-0198 | Community | Changes requested | 2/3 | 2026-10-22 11 d left | Review |
| AI-PRF-0047 v1.0.0 | Support-ticket router with a published evaluationCourse project · AI systems · Candidate C-0207 | Community | Reviews in progress | 2/3 | 2026-10-27 16 d left | Review |
Fair, transparent, auditable
How review stays fair
The rules every reviewer follows. They are part of the published protocol, AI-PRF-0005.
- 01
Assigned, not chosen
Institute and community reviewers are assigned by field and workload. Nobody picks which candidate they review. Public review is open to anyone.
- 02
Anonymous until decided
Every reviewer sees the candidate as a number. The name is attached only when the certificate is decided, so all three stages judge the work, not the person.
- 03
Conflicts declared first
Every review starts with a conflict declaration. A declared conflict turns the review into a comment with no score or verdict.
- 04
One public rubric
Five criteria, scored 0 to 3, published in advance. Two are must-pass. Any score below Meets needs a written reason.
- 05
Everything on the ledger
Every filed review is published with its scores, verdict and a chained digest. Reviews are never edited, only amended.
- 06
Appeals heard by others
A candidate can appeal a verdict once. A steward who did not take part rereads the record and the appeal outcome is published.