Adaptive Institute
Course projectIn reviewCommunity reviewChanges requested

Flood extent mapping from Sentinel-1 radar

AI-PRF-0046v1.0.1Earth observationCandidate C-0198stage open 2026-10-01 → 2026-10-22

Summary

Maps flood extent from radar backscatter before and after an event, with a reproducible notebook and a comparison against a published reference map.

Claims to check

  1. C1Agrees with the reference map on 91% of cells
  2. C2Runs end to end from public data in under 20 minutes

Evidence submitted

Notebook
Pinned environment, one-command rerun
Data sources
Sentinel-1 GRD, reference flood map
Write-up
Method, agreement, limits near urban areas

Automated checks

CHECKS / AI-PRF-0046v1.0.11 OF 2 PASSCLEAN ENV
  1. pass Notebook reruns · 17 min on a clean machine
  2. FAIL Agreement with reference · 84% (reported 91%) — different water mask

Checks run by the Institute on submission. A pass here is not a verdict.

Version history

  1. v1.0.12026-09-30Fixed DEM path in notebook
  2. v1.0.02026-09-20Submitted

Reviews already filed

  • RV-2026-0102CommunityM. LestariCommentno score · read v1.0.1
  • RV-2026-0103CommunityR. SetiawanRequest changes10/15 · read v1.0.1
See them on the ledger
The rubric, in full
  1. Works as briefed. Does it run from the instructions and do what the brief asks, on the test data? Must pass
  2. Claims match evidence. Is every claim in the write-up backed by a test, data or a demo you could rerun?
  3. Reproducible. Did a clean environment reproduce the reported results with the documented steps? Must pass
  4. Limits stated. Are failure cases and the limits of scope written down where a reader will see them?
  5. Responsible use. Are data sources cited and permitted, and are risks and human oversight addressed where relevant?

0 Missing · 1 Weak · 2 Meets · 3 Strong. Below Meets needs a written reason.

Your review

Community review of AI-PRF-0046

Reviewing as Y. Hakim · Candidate C-0198 stays anonymous to every reviewer until the decision. Everything you file here is published on the ledger under your name.

1 Conflict of interest
2 What you reviewed
3 Criteria0 / 15

Score each criterion against the public rubric. Must-pass criteria need Meets or better before you can accept.

  1. 01Works as briefedMust pass

    Does it run from the instructions and do what the brief asks, on the test data?

  2. 02Claims match evidence

    Is every claim in the write-up backed by a test, data or a demo you could rerun?

  3. 03ReproducibleMust pass

    Did a clean environment reproduce the reported results with the documented steps?

  4. 04Limits stated

    Are failure cases and the limits of scope written down where a reader will see them?

  5. 05Responsible use

    Are data sources cited and permitted, and are risks and human oversight addressed where relevant?

4 Verdict

Say what you checked, what you found, and what would change your verdict. Address the work, not the person.

0 / 120 min
No verdict yet

Filed reviews cannot be edited. To correct one, file an amendment; both stay on the ledger.