Editorial Board
Institute since 2024-12All tracks
- Reviews
- 64
- Agreement
- 94%
- Median
- 3 d
- Changes asked
- 22%
- Steward
- Founding reviewer
- On time
1 appeal upheld against a verdict
Reviewers
Who reviews, and how they are held to it
Standing comes from the public record only. It counts careful, timely reviews; nothing rewards accepting, and asking for changes never costs a reviewer anything.
Standing
What each figure means
- Reviews
- Reviews filed on the ledger, amendments not counted twice.
- Agreement
- How often the reviewer’s verdict matched the stage’s final outcome. Shown, never ranked: a lone dissent that turns out right is the most useful review there is.
- Median
- Median days from assignment to filing.
- Changes asked
- Share of reviews that requested changes. Shown so authors can see a reviewer’s bar.
- Appeals upheld
- Times a candidate appealed this reviewer’s verdict and the appeal succeeded.
Institute
Institute stewards
Staff who run the first stage and make stage decisions. They never review a project from a course they taught.
Community
Community reviewers
Practitioners who passed a field check. Assigned by field and workload, two or three per proof. Listed alphabetically.
B. Siregar
Community since 2025-06Cybersecurity
- Reviews
- 18
- Agreement
- 89%
- Median
- 4 d
- Changes asked
- 28%
- Field reviewer · Cybersecurity
- On time
M. Lestari
Community since 2025-04Earth observation
- Reviews
- 22
- Agreement
- 91%
- Median
- 5 d
- Changes asked
- 27%
- Field reviewer · Earth observation
- Reproducer
- On time
R. Setiawan
Community since 2025-08Earth observation · GIS
- Reviews
- 12
- Agreement
- 92%
- Median
- 5 d
- Changes asked
- 17%
- Field reviewer · Earth observation
T. Aditya
Community since 2025-03AI systems · Statistics
- Reviews
- 27
- Agreement
- 85%
- Median
- 7 d
- Changes asked
- 44%
- Field reviewer · AI systems
- Clear feedback
1 appeal upheld against a verdict
Y. Hakim
Community since 2025-02Cybersecurity
- Reviews
- 31
- Agreement
- 87%
- Median
- 6 d
- Changes asked
- 39%
- Field reviewer · Cybersecurity
- Reproducer
- Clear feedback
- Founding reviewer
Public
Public reviewers
Anyone with a verified account. Public reviews carry the same weight on the record as any other.
N. Rahman
Public since 2026-03AI systems
- Reviews
- 7
- Agreement
- 71%
- Median
- 3 d
- Changes asked
- 57%
No badges yet
1 appeal upheld against a verdict
P. Widodo
Public since 2026-01Earth observation
- Reviews
- 9
- Agreement
- 78%
- Median
- 2 d
- Changes asked
- 33%
- Reproducer
Badges
Earned from the record
Each badge has one published rule. A badge is removed if the record behind it changes.
- ReproducerReran 10 proofs from scratch and attached the run log
- On time20 reviews in a row filed before the stage closed
- Founding reviewerReviewed during the first public review cycle
- Clear feedback15 change requests that the author resolved without asking for clarification
- Field reviewerPassed the field check for a track (shown with the track)
- StewardInstitute staff; makes stage decisions, cannot review their own course
Become a reviewer
Review in public, from your first comment
Anyone with a verified account can file public reviews today. To join a community panel, pass the field check for a track: review two past proofs against the rubric, and a steward compares your scores with the record.
Start here
Open a proof in public review from the queue, read the rubric and the evidence, and file a review.